Context card
BetrSichV or GefStoffV: which ordinance carries the duty?
Does the duty to keep the explosion protection document current come from the BetrSichV or the GefStoffV?
The short answer
From the GefStoffV. The explosion protection document is part of the risk assessment under § 6 of the Ordinance on Hazardous Substances, which also requires its prompt update after significant changes. The BetrSichV governs the use and inspection of work equipment, including Ex equipment, and has its own review duty in § 3(7). The result is often the same; the legal basis is different.
For: Occupational safety specialists, plant operators, auditors and authors of compliance documentation
Key points
- GefStoffV § 6: risk assessment of hazardous substances, explosion protection document (para. 9), prompt update (para. 10).
- BetrSichV § 3(7): regular review of the risk assessment of work equipment, taking the state of the art into account.
- Both ordinances lead to the same practical result: keep the assessment current after every conversion.
- Attributing the duty to the wrong ordinance weakens any argument built on it.
- Technical Rules (TRBS, TRGS) carry a presumption effect; recommendations such as EmpfBS 1114 do not.
The context
Two ordinances, two subjects
The BetrSichV is about work equipment: its provision, use, maintenance and inspection. The GefStoffV is about activities with hazardous substances, including fire and explosion hazards. The explosion protection document belongs to the second.
Where they meet
Ex equipment is work equipment, so its inspections follow the BetrSichV. The zone classification, the explosion protection concept and the duty to update the document follow the GefStoffV. A conversion therefore usually touches both: the risk assessment of the equipment and the explosion protection document.
Why the distinction matters
In discussions about grandfathering the duty is often attributed to the wrong ordinance. The result may not change, but the citation does, and an argument with the wrong legal basis is easy to dismiss. The same care applies to the weight of a source: a Technical Rule carries a presumption effect, a recommendation such as EmpfBS 1114 does not.
Questions readers ask next
- Does the BetrSichV also require an explosion protection document?
- No. The document is required by § 6(9) GefStoffV. The BetrSichV refers to the zones for the selection and inspection of work equipment.
- Does this distinction exist outside Germany?
- The EU basis is Directive 1999/92/EC; each member state transposes it in its own law. The split between equipment use and hazardous substances is German.
Sources
- Betriebssicherheitsverordnung (BetrSichV) — Bundesministerium der Justiz
- Gefahrstoffverordnung (GefStoffV) § 6 — Bundesministerium der Justiz
Review log and changes
Every context card is checked against its sources before it is published, and again whenever it changes; the date under the byline is the last review. Corrections (something was wrong) and additions (something was missing) are logged below with date and time (Berlin time). Typos, formatting and link fixes are not listed.
Reviewed
Corrections and additions
Every correction and addition to this card, with date and time (Berlin time).
Correction
Corrected the wording of § 3(7) BetrSichV in the key points: regular review of the risk assessment, taking the state of the art into account.